In Jungian psychology, the Shadow is a figure who is everything that you are not. Often, it is seen as evil. The Shadow can be helpful in establishing a sense of self, but a personal identity based only on the Shadow is dependent and reactive, and can easily become unhealthy.. In fact, if you define yourself only in terms of the Shadow, you risk taking on characteristics of the Shadow, partly because you are refusing to deal with the aspects of your personality that you have invested in the Shadow, and partly because anything seems justified in order to fend off the shadow.
When people in the free software community solemnly tell me that “Eternal vigilance is the price of freedom,” and draw obsessive diagrams of all the ways that Microsoft is undermining the community, that’s what I see: People on the brink of assuming some of the traits they claim to despite in their Shadow.
Fighting the Shadow can be dramatic and lend purpose to people’s lives, but it doesn’t make for sound thinking, even in their own terms. It lures them into thinking in dichotomies, believing that everyone must either be a vigilant soldier or else an optimist too full of naive to see a threat. With no middle ground, they can lose allies. Similarly, in focusing on one Shadowy figure, they risk overlooking other concerns.
And let’s say they’re right: Microsoft is the Great Satan, and an apocalyptic battle is just a matter of time. What happens once the Shadow is defeated? Inescapably, a good part of their purpose in life has gone, because they have lost all that they measured themselves against.
You can’t completely ignore Microsoft’s actions, even those that are not directly concerned with free software (In previous posts, I was exaggerating for rhetorical effect). Microsoft’s influence is simply too great. But I don’t want to ignore other things while keeping an eye out for possible concerns.
The free software community has a lot to be proud of. Collectively, its members have built an alternative that, overall, is comparable to its proprietary rivals. It’s done so by developing collaborative work methods, and principled stands that give ordinary people control over important parts of their lives, and helps the poor and those handicapped by a lack of national development meet the privileged on a more equal footing. It’s changed how business is done. It’s helped to preserve minority languages. It’s green. All these are important accomplishments.
That’s how you overcome the Shadow – by building a self-contained identity that robs it of its power over you.
I don’t know about anyone else, but, at the end of my life, I’d rather look back and remember that I played a small role in those accomplishments than admit I spent my life hating a corporation. It’s not as exciting as imagining yourself locked in adversity with a Dark Lord, but it’s certainly more constructive and longer lasting – to say nothing of more interesting.
🙂 No Shadows, Bruce, trust me. I know what many of us see. Watch, for example, what happens with OOXML, which you have not covered in any of your recent articles.
It isn’t what you see that defines the Shadow, Roy. It’s how you interpret what you see and how you react to it.
I’m not sure what covering or not covering a particular topic has to do with anything. Are you implying that I’m unaware of the situation because I haven’t written about it?
If so, you’re mistaking selectivity (both mine and my editors’) for lack of awareness.
I just think (even know) that there is an area that is scarcely explored. It’s not even a matter of interpretation, just observation.
I think that the “Microsoft dragon” is severely wounded (with Windows Vista being a wound of the self-inflicted kind) but is not slane. And yes OOXML is a new front that Microsoft is taking its battle to.
But if you look at it, it’s an assault that is of the defensive kind.
Today, just about all of the truly exciting things that are happening in the world of computer software are happening in the world of free and open source software.
I think that’s pretty clear in the “tech world”, but “Joe and Jane computer user” are by and large unaware of it.
The challenge is how to make “Joe and Jane computer user” aware of this new software world when all they have ever known is “the dragon” to the point where they can’t even conceive of a world without it.